top of page

Beyond Human Bonds

Modern urban canine welfare is often organised around a dyadic default, where regulation concentrates within the human–dog bond. This structure can reduce intraspecific social continuity and increase management of the dog’s behaviour and environment.

The Relational Ecology model proposed here suggests that welfare is not an individual trait but an emergent property of a functional regulatory network. When ecological agency is constrained and social buffering becomes limited, regulation increasingly shifts into the human–dog dyad, raising the risk of stress synchronisation and reducing the dog’s emotional resilience.

poster iocan.001.jpeg

Key References

Anderson, K.L.; Casey, R.A.; Cooper, B.; Upjohn, M.M.; Christley, R.M. National Dog Survey: Describing UK Dog and Ownership Demographics. Animals 2023, 13, 1072.

 

Bonanni, R.; Cafazzo, S.; Abis, A.; Barillari, E.; Valsecchi, P.; Natoli, E. Age-Graded Dominance Hierarchies and Social Tolerance in Packs of Free-Ranging Dogs. Behav. Ecol. 2017, 28, 1004–1020.

 

Bonanni, R.; Cafazzo, S.; Valsecchi, P.; Natoli, E. Effect of Affiliative and Agonistic Relationships on Leadership Behaviour in Free-Ranging Dogs. Anim. Behav. 2010, 79, 981–991.

 

Cimarelli, G.; Marshall-Pescini, S.; Range, F.; Berghänel, A.; Virányi, Z. Relationship Quality Affects Social Stress Buffering in Dogs and Wolves. Anim. Behav. 2021, 178, 127–140.

 

Dietz, L.; Arnold, A.-M.K.; Goerlich-Jansson, V.C.; Vinke, C.M. The Importance of Early Life Experiences for the Development of Behavioural Disorders in Domestic Dogs. Behaviour 2018, 155*, 83–114.

 

Duranton, C.; Gaunet, F. Behavioural Synchrony from an Ethological Perspective: Overview of Its Adaptive Value. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2016, 184, 10–21.

 

Friedmann, E.; Gee, N.R.; Simonsick, E.M.; Resnick, B.; Gurlu, M.; Adesanya, I.; Shim, S. Pet Ownership, Pet Attachment, and Longitudinal Changes in Psychological Health—Evidence from the Baltimore Longitudinal Study of Aging. Geriatrics 2025, 10, 156.

 

Furedi, F. Culture of Fear: Risk-Taking and the Morality of Low Expectation; Continuum: London, UK, 2002.

 

Heurlin, J.; Barabás, G.; Roth, L.S.V. Behavioural Synchronisation between Different Groups of Dogs and Wolves and Their Owners/Handlers: Exploring the Effect of Breed and Human Interaction. PLOS ONE 2024, 19, e0302833.

 

Kikusui, T.; Winslow, J.T.; Mori, Y. Social Buffering: Relief from Stress and Anxiety. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2006, 361*, 2215–2228.

 

Miklósi, Á. Dog Behaviour, Evolution, and Cognition; Oxford University Press: Oxford, UK, 2014.

Northrope, K.; Ruby, M.B.; Howell, T.J. How Attachment to Dogs and to Other Humans Relate to Mental Health. Animals 2024, 14, 2773.

 

Palagi, E.; Cordoni, G. Intraspecific Motor and Emotional Alignment in Dogs and Wolves: The Basic Building Blocks of Dog-Human Affective Connectedness. Animals 2020, 10, 241.

 

Porges, S.W. The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-Regulation; W. W. Norton: New York, NY, USA, 2011.

 

Puurunen, J.; Hakanen, E.; Salonen, M.K.; Mikkola, S.; Sulkama, S.; Araujo, C.; Lohi, H. Inadequate Socialisation, Inactivity, and Urban Living Environment Are Associated with Social Fearfulness in Pet Dogs. Sci. Rep. 2020, 10, 3527.

 

Sundman, A.-S.; Van Poucke, E.; Svensson Holm, A.-C.; Faresjö, Å.; Theodorsson, E.; Jensen, P.; Roth, L.S.V. Long-Term Stress Levels Are Synchronized in Dogs and Their Owners. Sci. Rep. 2019, 9, 7391.

 

Thielke, L.E.; Udell, M.A.R. Characterizing Human–Dog Attachment Relationships in Foster and Shelter Environments as a Potential Mechanism for Achieving Mutual Wellbeing and Success. Animals 2020, 10*, 67.

 

Trisko, R.K.; Sandel, A.A.; Smuts, B. Affiliation, Dominance and Friendship among Companion Dogs. Behaviour 2016, 153, 693–725.

 

Ward, C. Greeting Behavior between Dogs in a Dog Park. Pet Behav. Sci. 2020, 10, 1–14.

 

Westgarth, C.; Christley, R.M.; Pinchbeck, G.L.; Gaskell, R.M.; Dawson, S.; Bradshaw, J.W.S. Dog Behaviour on Walks and the Effect of Use of the Leash. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2010, 125, 38–46.

 

Widmer, S.; Albrechtslund, A. The Ambiguities of Surveillance as Care and Control: Struggles in the Domestication of Location-Tracking Applications by Danish Parents. Nord. Rev. 2021, 42, 79–93.

 

Wood, L.; Martin, K.; Christian, H.; Nathan, A.; Lauritsen, C.; Houghton, S.; Kawachi, I.; McCune, S. The Pet Factor — Companion Animals as a Conduit for Getting to Know People, Friendship Formation and Social Support. PLOS ONE 2015, 10*, e0122085.

bottom of page